Quantum language or quantum confusion?


TOPIC: David-Wynn Miller – Quantum Language
KEY POINTS: Suggests that magic language syntax can win court cases and make iron clad contracts.
BENEFIT OF REVIEWING THIS MATERIAL: I’m on the fence. He makes a lot of claims that I can not verify. He seems like a bright guy and seems sincere, but the suggestion that you need to spend 200 hours on this just to get an insight seems hard to get over.
LENGTH OF VIDEO: 17 thirty minute videos.
LINK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHcRWyB1wj0&feature=related
Counter point: Demystifying_Law

If you have had success with David’s approach, post your thoughts here. If you have not had success, post your thoughts as well. If you google “David Wynn Miller scams”, you will get a few hits. Not surprising. If this is viable, it would seem that he should be tarred and feathered on the net. I am not aware of a 92 degree mason, which he claims to be. (doesn’t mean there isn’t one, just that it is REALLY secret) He claims to have rewritten the constitution for Hawaii and had an influence in the events of 911. Claims to be working on many drafts of contracts for many countries, claims to have 88 countries as “allies”, claims to have “syntaxed” the Postal Treaties and seized 43 Million in trusts. It is hard to accept that TPTB are this careless. He further claims that this will become the world standard of contracts on April 6, 2012.

Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick himself up and continue on.
Winston Churchill

I’d like to start a discussion on this.

Every letter contains a message David Sacks – Language Visible Unraveling the Mystery of the Alphabet From A to Z

Bonus Link: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXa8cO9mXFk

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Quantum language or quantum confusion?

  1. I am actually quite surprised people are not seeing thru this guy faster. Within the first 30 min I was chucking a lot. His big claim is just so absurd. Language IS THE PROBLEM !! There’s no way to boil down language to a math objective scenario. That would throw out most of the ways we talk. Second of all his Syntax examples i have seen make 0 sense. Even if it was mathematically/grammatically correct what difference does it make if its incomprehensible. I have seen judges ignore defense arguments just cause the story was a bit complex. This syntax stuff is beyond illegible. In no way can one obviously look at it and understand it and clearly see how the old language is debunked. As if the court system is going care about some new thing like this. Like they are gonna change.

    Where’s the evidence that the whole world court system freaked out and started rewriting everything in syntax. From what he said, he would be the most dangerous guy in the world. lol

    Learning another language might help someone understand how ridiculous this claim is. The ambiguity, creativity, subjectivity, etc is exactly why language exists in this level of the illusion. We dont need to fix language (5th chakra), we need to use a higher frequency of communication (6th chakra) to correct many of the distortions of the 5th chakra vibration. We have mistaken the map for the territory and so many intellectuals are such saps for words.

    “Love is just a word, its the connection the word implies.” – The Matrix

    So, its impossible to boil language down to an objective math so everybody has the same implied connections with infinitely many phrases and such used to express ourselves. I cannot even stress how problematic interpretation of an experience is vs the experience itself. Thats where all the filters exist that distort reality. In no way does syntax show a means to break down all human distortion.

  2. A friend of mine had a felony court case against her today. She used David’s stuff and the case was vacated. I don’t know why. Maybe they couldn’t understand her paperwork, or maybe, just maybe, the stuff is correct. If you spend enough time with fibonacci, sacred geometry, the history of numerology and the history of law and “gram-mar”, it starts making a little more sense the more you look at it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s